If we divide (6.59) by (6.60) we find that the fraction of total wealth invested according to belief h at time t converges to:

Wth
Wt
p
 
qth.

C. Equilibrium price for s>0

If s>0, then the derivation of the equilibrium price becomes more complex. By substituting (6.24) and (6.29) in (6.35) we can rewrite (6.35) as the solution to a quadratic equation of Pt. The formulas for the equilibrium price Pt are:
c1=
1
R
 
hB1
qth
c3
Eth(Pt+1+Dt+1);
c2=R(Wt-1-s Pt-1)+s Dt;
c3=
 
hB1
qth;
c4=
 
hB2
qth yth;
Discr=(c1 c3 R s + c2 c3 R - a c2 c4 σ2)2 + 4 a c1 c2 c3 R s σ2;
Pt=
(c1 c3 R s-c2 c3R + a c2 c4 σ2) + Discr
2 s (c3 R + a (1-c4) σ2)
.
    (61)
Here c1 is the net present value of the average of the expected future price plus dividend by all agents in belief group B1, c2 is the total amount of money invested in the risk free asset by all agents, c3 is the total fraction of market wealth assigned to beliefs in group B1 and c4 is the fraction of market wealth invested in the risky asset by agents in belief group B2 at time t. For the equilibrium equation to be solvable for Pt it is necessary that there is a belief hB1 for which qth>0. If for all beliefs hB1: qth=0, then there is no solution for Pt. Further, an upperbound should be imposed on the fraction of total market wealth traders in group B2 can go long in the market. If s>0, then the fraction of total market wealth invested in the risky asset lies between 0 and 1, that is
0 ≤
 
hB1
qth yth +
 
hB2
qth yth < 1,
or equivalently
-
 
hB1
qth yth
 
hB2
qth yth < 1-
 
hB1
qth yth.
282