If we divide (6.59) by (6.60) we find that the fraction of total wealth invested according to belief h at time t converges to:
C. Equilibrium price for s>0
If
s>0, then the derivation of the equilibrium price becomes more complex. By substituting (6.24) and (6.29) in (6.35) we can rewrite (6.35) as the solution to a quadratic equation of
Pt. The formulas for the equilibrium price
Pt are:
|
|
|
| c2=R(Wt-1-s Pt-1)+s Dt; |
|
|
| Discr=(c1 c3 R s + c2 c3 R - a c2 c4 σ2)2 + 4 a c1 c2 c3 R s σ2; |
| Pt= |
| (c1 c3 R s-c2 c3R + a c2 c4 σ2) + Discr |
|
| 2 s (c3 R + a (1-c4) σ2) |
|
. |
|
|
(61) |
Here
c1 is the net present value of the average of the expected future price plus dividend by all agents in belief group
B1,
c2 is the total amount of money invested in the risk free asset by all agents,
c3 is the total fraction of market wealth assigned to beliefs in group
B1 and
c4 is the fraction of market wealth invested in the risky asset by agents in belief group
B2 at time
t. For the equilibrium equation to be solvable for
Pt it is necessary that there is a belief
h ∈
B1 for which
qth>0. If for all beliefs
h ∈
B1:
qth=0, then there is no solution for
Pt. Further, an upperbound should be imposed on the fraction of total market wealth traders in group
B2 can go long in the market. If
s>0, then the fraction of total market wealth invested in the risky asset lies between 0 and 1, that is
| 0 ≤ |
|
qth yth + |
|
qth yth < 1, |
or equivalently
| - |
|
qth yth ≤ |
|
qth yth < 1- |
|
qth yth. |
282